ArticleOral radiology2024
Artificial intelligence for caries detection: a novel diagnostic tool using deep learning algorithms.
Article in Oral radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in periapical radiography: a systematic review.Odontology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for binary dental caries diagnosis using intraoral images and dental radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Explainable artificial intelligence in dental imaging: a systematic review of interpretability and the current state of trust evidence.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Assessing the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Caries Detection and Clinical Decision-Making: A Scoping Review.Caries research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for dental caries diagnosis: translating algorithms to clinical practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Caries is a gradient, not a boundary: Detection rather than segmentation is the appropriate deep learning approach.Imaging science in dentistry · 2025Article
- ACO-optimized MobileNetV2-ShuffleNet hybrid model for automated dental caries classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for dental caries detection: A mixup, fine-tuning, and quantization approach on the MobileNetV2 model.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Hybrid CNN-Transformer Model for Accurate Impacted Tooth Detection in Panoramic Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Integrated with Intraoral Digital Imaging in Dental Caries Detection, Treatment Planning, and Clinical Decision-Making: A Scoping Review.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Clinical Validation of Deep Learning for Segmentation of Multiple Dental Features in Periapical Radiographs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop an assessment tool for automatic detection of dental caries in periapical radiographs using convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture.
methodsA novel diagnostic model named ResNet + SAM was established using numerous periapical radiographs (4278 images) annotated by medical experts to automatically detect dental caries. The performance of the model was compared to the traditional CNNs (VGG19, ResNet-50), and the dentists. The Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) technique shows the region of interest in the image for the CNNs.
resultsResNet + SAM demonstrated significantly improved performance compared to the modified ResNet-50 model, with an average F1 score of 0.886 (95% CI 0.855-0.918), accuracy of 0.885 (95% CI 0.862-0.901) and AUC of 0.954 (95% CI 0.924-0.980). The comparison between the performance of the model and the dentists revealed that the model achieved higher accuracy than that of the junior dentists. With the assist of the tool, the dentists achieved superior metrics with a mean F1 score of 0.827 and the interobserver agreement for dental caries is enhanced from 0.592/0.610 to 0.706/0.723.
conclusionsAccording to the results obtained from the experiments, the automatic assessment tool using the ResNet + SAM model shows remarkable performance and has excellent possibilities in identifying dental caries. The use of the assessment tool in clinical practice can be of great benefit as a clinical decision-making support in dentistry and reduce the workload of dentists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.