ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024
Outcomes of accelerated corneal cross-linking for pediatric and adult keratoconus: a comparative study.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes of a high irradiance accelerated corneal crosslinking (ACXL) protocol after a 12-month follow-up between pediatric and adult patients with progressive keratoconus (KC).
methodsRetrospective, comparative, cohort study. Patients with KC were divided into two groups: pediatric (≤ 18 years) and adult (> 18 years). All of them were managed with epi-OFF ACXL (30 mW/cm
resultsEighty-nine eyes (53 patients) were included for analysis; 45 (50.6%) eyes were from pediatric patients and 44 (49.4%) from adults. At one-year follow-up, pediatric patients experienced significantly higher rates of progression (22.2% vs. 4.5%, p = .014). Contrariwise, female gender (Beta = - 3.62, p = .018), a baseline uncorrected visual acuity of Snellen ≥ 20/60 (Beta = - 5.96, p = .007), and being ≥ 15 years at ACXL treatment (Beta = - 0.31, p = .021) were associated with non-progressive disease. A significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity, K
conclusionsDespite the similarity in visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes in both groups, younger age was associated with KC progression after ACXL at one year of follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38498219What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.