Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38498217›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2024

Prophylactic defunctioning stomas improve clinical outcomes of anastomotic leak following rectal cancer resections: An analysis of the US Rectal Cancer Consortium.

Katherine Hrebinko, Vincent P Anto, Katherine M Reitz, Adriana C Gamboa, Scott E Regenbogen, Alexander T Hawkins, M Benjamin Hopkins, Aslam Ejaz, Philip S Bauer, Paul E Wise and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Anastomotic Leak Following Colorectal Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine Hrebinko *Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7350-9033
Vincent P Anto *Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
Katherine M ReitzDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
Adriana C GamboaDivision of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Austin, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1828-4219
Scott E RegenbogenDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Alexander T HawkinsSection of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8531-7247
M Benjamin HopkinsSection of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
Aslam EjazDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Philip S BauerDepartment of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, USA.
Paul E WiseSection of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3798-7913
Glen C BalchDivision of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1575-9170
Jennifer Holder-MurrayDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Office Building, Suite 603, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. holdermurrayjm@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USAllegheny Health Network · USEmory University · USThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Vascular Surgery Research Training (VascTrain) ProgramT32HL098036 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Edith Tzeng · 2010 to 2026
$7.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS 5T32HL0098036NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098036NIA NIH HHS L30 AG064730NIH HHS L30AG064730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnastomotic leak (AL) is a complication of low anterior resection (LAR) that results in substantial morbidity. There is immense interest in evaluating immediate postoperative and long-term oncologic outcomes in patients who undergo diverting loop ileostomies (DLI). The purpose of this study is to understand the relationship between fecal diversion, AL, and oncologic outcomes.

methodsThis is a retrospective multicenter cohort study using patient data obtained from the US Rectal Cancer Consortium database compiled from six academic institutions. The study population included patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing LAR. The primary outcome was the incidence of AL among patients who did or did not receive DLI during LAR. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for AL, receipt of adjuvant therapy, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year recurrence.

resultsOf 815 patients, 38 (4.7%) suffered AL after LAR. Patients with AL were more likely to be male, have unintentional preoperative weight loss, and are less likely to undergo DLI. On multivariable analysis, DLI remained protective against AL (p < 0.001). Diverted patients were less likely to undergo future surgical procedures including additional ostomy creation, completion proctectomy, or pelvic washout for AL. Subgroup analysis of 456 patients with locally advanced disease showed that DLI was correlated with increased receipt of adjuvant therapy for patients with and without AL on univariate analysis (SHR:1.59; [95% CI 1.19-2.14]; p = 0.002), but significance was not met in multivariate models.

conclusionLack of DLI and preoperative weight loss was associated with anastomotic leak. Fecal diversion may improve the timely initiation of adjuvant oncologic therapy. The long-term outcomes following routine diverting stomas warrant further study.

Indexed as

ProctectomyRectal NeoplasmsSurgical StomasAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsWeight LossAnastomotic leakClinical outcomesFecal diversionRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID38498217
PMCPMC10948474
OpenAlexW4392919805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.