Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38498181›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2024

[Handoffs in the intensive care unit].

Eyleen Reifarth, Jan-Hendrik Naendrup, Jorge Garcia Borrega, Lisa Altenrath, Alexander Shimabukuro-Vornhagen, Dennis Alexander Eichenauer, Matthias Kochanek, Boris Böll

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eyleen ReifarthKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. eyleen.reifarth@uk-koeln.de.
Jan-Hendrik NaendrupKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
Jorge Garcia BorregaKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
Lisa AltenrathKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
Alexander Shimabukuro-VornhagenKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
Dennis Alexander EichenauerKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
Matthias KochanekKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
Boris BöllKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective handoffs in the intensive care unit (ICU) are key to patient safety. PURPOSE: This article aims to raise awareness of the significance of structured and thorough handoffs and highlights possible challenges as well as means for improvement. MATERIALS AND

methodsBased on the available literature, the evidence regarding handoffs in ICUs is summarized and suggestions for practical implementation are derived.

resultsThe quality of handoffs has an impact on patient safety. At the same time, communication in the intensive care setting is particularly challenging due to the complexity of cases, a disruptive work environment, and a multitude of inter- and intraprofessional interactions. Hierarchical team structures, deficiencies in feedback and error-management culture, (technical) language barriers in communication, as well as substantial physical and psychological stress may negatively influence the effectiveness of handoffs. Sets of interventions such as the implementation of checklists, mnemonics, and communication workshops contribute to a more structured and thorough handoff process and have the potential to significantly improve patient safety.

conclusionEffective handoffs are the cornerstone of high-quality and safe patient care but face particular challenges in ICUs. Interventional measures such as structuring handoff concepts and periodic communication trainings can help to improve handoffs and thus increase patient safety.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPatient HandoffPatient SafetyChecklistCritical CareGermanyHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationMedical ErrorsPatient Care TeamAcronymsChecklistCommunicationFeedbackPatient safety

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.