ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Primary sclerosing cholangitis-Diagnosis and treatment 2024].
Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetic modelling of MRI-based liver function for risk assessment in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a prospective pilot study.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- CDC42: unlocking a novel therapeutic target for primary sclerosing cholangitis through Mendelian randomization.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The etiology of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) remains unclear, which explains in part the lack of a causal treatment. The differential diagnostic distinction from the even rarer immunoglobulin 4 (IgG4)-associated cholangitis (IAC) is becoming increasingly more successful. Advances in the understanding of different clinical courses, improvements in noninvasive diagnostics through modern magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the introduction of liver elastography have led to the development of improved prognostic models. The evidence for recommendations on medicinal (e.g., ursodeoxycholic acid) or endoscopic treatment (e.g., balloon dilatation and/or stent insertion) for PSC is still low. In contrast, the long-term results of liver transplantation in PSC patients are constantly improving. Due to the lack of highly sensitive and specific screening methods the early recognition of cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC) as the most important complication is rarely successful. The continuous improvement of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and direct cholangioscopy in combination with molecular biological and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses of bile duct tissue samples are promising for refined diagnostics. Due to the significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer, an annual colonoscopy is recommended in the presence of inflammatory bowel disease. Improvement of the early diagnostics of PSC and successful testing of new treatment strategies raise hope for a continuous improvement in the medical support of these complex patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.