SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2024
Population pharmacokinetic analyses of methotrexate in pediatric patients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Successful re-exposure to high-dose methotrexate after severely delayed methotrexate elimination and renal toxicity in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Comparative Molecular Insights and Computational Modeling of Multiple Myeloma and Osteosarcoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Assessment of drug levels as a biomarker in rheumatoid arthritis.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Review
- Global research on the utilization of population pharmacokinetic model: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2024.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Population Pharmacokinetics and Covariate Analysis of Methotrexate in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesMethotrexate is widely utilized in the chemotherapy of malignant tumors and autoimmune diseases in the pediatric population, but dosing can be challenging. Several population pharmacokinetic models were developed to characterize factors influencing variability and improve individualization of dosing regimens. However, significant covariates included varied across studies. The primary objective of this review was to summarize and discuss population pharmacokinetic models of methotrexate and covariates that influence pharmacokinetic variability in pediatric patients.
methodsSystematic searches were conducted in the PubMed and EMBASE databases from inception to 7 July 2023. Reporting Quality was evaluated based on a checklist with 31 items. The characteristics of studies and information for model construction and validation were extracted, summarized, and discussed.
resultsEighteen studies (four prospective studies and fourteen retrospective studies with sample sizes of 14 to 772 patients and 2.7 to 93.1 samples per patient) were included in this study. Two-compartment models were the commonly used structural models for methotrexate, and the clearance range of methotrexate ranged from 2.32 to 19.03 L/h (median: 6.86 L/h). Body size and renal function were found to significantly affect the clearance of methotrexate for pediatric patients. There were limited reports on the role of other covariates, such as gene polymorphisms and co-medications, in the pharmacokinetic parameters of methotrexate pediatric patients. Internal and external evaluations were used to assess the performance of the population pharmacokinetic models.
conclusionA more rigorous external evaluation needs to be performed before routine clinical use to select the appropriate PopPK model. Further research is necessary to incorporate larger cohorts or pool analyses in specific susceptible pediatric populations to improve the understanding of predicted exposure profiles and covariate identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.