Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38498039›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2024

Reducing Loneliness and Social Isolation of Older Adults Through Voice Assistants: Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis.

Rachele Alessandra Marziali, Claudia Franceschetti, Adrian Dinculescu, Alexandru Nistorescu, Dominic Mircea Kristály, Adrian Alexandru Moșoi, Ronny Broekx, Mihaela Marin, Cristian Vizitiu, Sorin-Aurel Moraru and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rachele Alessandra Marziali *Centre for Innovative Models for Aging Care and Technology, IRCCS INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Aging, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-9545-6395
Claudia Franceschetti *Centre for Innovative Models for Aging Care and Technology, IRCCS INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Aging, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-6327-4814
Adrian Dinculescu *The Space Applications and Technologies Laboratory, Institute of Space Science - Subsidiary of INFLPR (National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics), Magurele, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9439-8715
Alexandru Nistorescu *The Space Applications and Technologies Laboratory, Institute of Space Science - Subsidiary of INFLPR (National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics), Magurele, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6166-6768
Dominic Mircea Kristály *Department of Automatics and Information Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4860-886X
Adrian Alexandru Moșoi *Department of Psychology and Education Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6601-3144
Ronny Broekx *Innovation Department, ePoint, Hamont, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3803-8664
Mihaela Marin *The Space Applications and Technologies Laboratory, Institute of Space Science - Subsidiary of INFLPR (National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics), Magurele, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6571-2397
Cristian Vizitiu *The Space Applications and Technologies Laboratory, Institute of Space Science - Subsidiary of INFLPR (National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics), Magurele, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2435-5028
Sorin-Aurel Moraru *Department of Automatics and Information Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9500-2604
Lorena Rossi *Centre for Innovative Models for Aging Care and Technology, IRCCS INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Aging, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5688-105X
Mirko Di Rosa *Centre for Biostatistics and Applied Geriatric Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS INRCA-National Institute of Health and Science on Aging, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1862-4159

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoneliness and social isolation are major public health concerns for older adults, with severe mental and physical health consequences. New technologies may have a great impact in providing support to the daily lives of older adults and addressing the many challenges they face. In this scenario, technologies based on voice assistants (VAs) are of great interest and potential benefit in reducing loneliness and social isolation in this population, because they could overcome existing barriers with other digital technologies through easier and more natural human-computer interaction.

objectiveThis study aims to investigate the use of VAs to reduce loneliness and social isolation of older adults by performing a systematic literature review and a bibliometric cluster mapping analysis.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for articles that were published in the last 6 years, related to the following main topics: voice interface, VA, older adults, isolation, and loneliness. A total of 40 articles were found, of which 16 (40%) were included in this review. The included articles were then assessed through a qualitative scoring method and summarized. Finally, a bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer software (Leiden University's Centre for Science and Technology Studies).

resultsOf the 16 articles included in the review, only 2 (13%) were considered of poor methodological quality, whereas 9 (56%) were of medium quality and 5 (31%) were of high quality. Finally, through bibliometric analysis, 221 keywords were extracted, of which 36 (16%) were selected. The most important keywords, by number of occurrences and by total link strength; results of the analysis with the Association Strength normalization method; and default values were then presented. The final bibliometric network consisted of 36 selected keywords, which were grouped into 3 clusters related to 3 main topics (ie, VA use for social isolation among older adults, the significance of age in the context of loneliness, and the impact of sex factors on well-being). For most of the selected articles, the effect of VA on social isolation and loneliness of older adults was a minor theme. However, more investigations were done on user experience, obtaining preliminary positive results.

conclusionsMost articles on the use of VAs by older adults to reduce social isolation and loneliness focus on usability, acceptability, or user experience. Nevertheless, studies directly addressing the impact that using a VA has on the social isolation and loneliness of older adults find positive and promising results and provide important information for future research, interventions, and policy development in the field of geriatric care and technology.

Indexed as

LonelinessSocial IsolationAgedBibliometricsCluster AnalysisDatabases, FactualHumansbibliometric analysisliterature reviewlonelinessmobile phoneolder adultssocial isolationvoice assistant

Identifiers

PMID38498039
PMCPMC10985600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.