Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38497958›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Leveraging large language models for generating responses to patient messages-a subjective analysis.

Siru Liu, Allison B McCoy, Aileen P Wright, Babatunde Carew, Julian Z Genkins, Sean S Huang, Josh F Peterson, Bryan Steitz, Adam Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Large Language Models and Empathy: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Gaps in artificial intelligence research for rural health in the United States: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  19. Large Language Models in Surgery: Promise, Pitfalls, and Practical Use.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026
    Review
  20. Large Language Models and Primary Care: A Scoping Review.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Siru LiuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, United States.
Allison B McCoyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2292-9147
Aileen P WrightDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, United States.
Babatunde CarewDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, United States.
Julian Z GenkinsDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, United States.
Sean S HuangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, United States.
Josh F PetersonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, United States.
Bryan SteitzDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, United States.
Adam WrightDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6844-145X

Funding

Safety Promotion through Early Event Detection in the Elderly (SPEEDe)R01AG062499 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WRIGHT, ADAM T · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Strategies for Engineering Reliable Value Sets (SERVS)R01LM013995 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ADAM T WRIGHT · 2022 to 2026
$1.0M
Optimizing Clinical Decision Support Alerts Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)R00LM014097 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LIU, SIRU · 2023 to 2024
$498k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062499NIH HHS R00LM014097-01NLM NIH HHS R00 LM014097NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and assess the performance of fine-tuned large language models for generating responses to patient messages sent via an electronic health record patient portal. MATERIALS AND

methodsUtilizing a dataset of messages and responses extracted from the patient portal at a large academic medical center, we developed a model (CLAIR-Short) based on a pre-trained large language model (LLaMA-65B). In addition, we used the OpenAI API to update physician responses from an open-source dataset into a format with informative paragraphs that offered patient education while emphasizing empathy and professionalism. By combining with this dataset, we further fine-tuned our model (CLAIR-Long). To evaluate fine-tuned models, we used 10 representative patient portal questions in primary care to generate responses. We asked primary care physicians to review generated responses from our models and ChatGPT and rated them for empathy, responsiveness, accuracy, and usefulness.

resultsThe dataset consisted of 499 794 pairs of patient messages and corresponding responses from the patient portal, with 5000 patient messages and ChatGPT-updated responses from an online platform. Four primary care physicians participated in the survey. CLAIR-Short exhibited the ability to generate concise responses similar to provider's responses. CLAIR-Long responses provided increased patient educational content compared to CLAIR-Short and were rated similarly to ChatGPT's responses, receiving positive evaluations for responsiveness, empathy, and accuracy, while receiving a neutral rating for usefulness.

conclusionThis subjective analysis suggests that leveraging large language models to generate responses to patient messages demonstrates significant potential in facilitating communication between patients and healthcare providers.

Indexed as

Patient PortalsDatasets as TopicElectronic Health RecordsEmpathyHumansNatural Language ProcessingPhysician-Patient Relationsartificial intelligenceclinical decision supportlarge language modelpatient portalprimary care

Identifiers

PMID38497958
PMCPMC11105129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.