Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38497824›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2024

Fitting the Cox proportional hazards model to big data.

Jianqiao Wang, Donglin Zeng, Dan-Yu Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianqiao WangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Donglin ZengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0843-9280
Dan-Yu LinDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0150-3115

Funding

Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Improve Dynamic Treatment Regimens Estimation Using Real World Data.R01GM124104 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Yuanjia Wang, Donglin Zeng · 2018 to 2026
$3.1M
Semiparametric Analysis of Big Censored DataR01HL149683 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIN, DANYU · 2020 to 2023
$1.9M
Semiparametric Regression Analysis of Interval-Censored Data in Current Cohort StudiesR01HL173128 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Donglin Zeng · 2024 to 2026
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL173128NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124104NIH HHS R01 HL149683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The semiparametric Cox proportional hazards model, together with the partial likelihood principle, has been widely used to study the effects of potentially time-dependent covariates on a possibly censored event time. We propose a computationally efficient method for fitting the Cox model to big data involving millions of study subjects. Specifically, we perform maximum partial likelihood estimation on a small subset of the whole data and improve the initial estimator by incorporating the remaining data through one-step estimation with estimated efficient score functions. We show that the final estimator has the same asymptotic distribution as the conventional maximum partial likelihood estimator using the whole dataset but requires only a small fraction of computation time. We demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed method through extensive simulation studies and an application to the UK Biobank data.

Indexed as

Big DataUK BiobankComputer SimulationHumansProbabilityProportional Hazards Modelscensoringefficient scoreone-step estimationpartial likelihoodtime complexitytime-dependent covariates

Identifiers

PMID38497824
PMCPMC10946235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.