Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38497674›Full record

ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2024

New horizons in dermatological education: Skin cancer screening with virtual reality.

Anna Junga, Paul Schmidle, Leon Pielage, Henriette Schulze, Ole Hätscher, Sonja Ständer, Bernhard Marschall, Stephan Alexander Braun, medicaltr.AI.ning Consortium

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. New horizons in dermatological education: Skin cancer screening with virtual reality.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna JungaInstitute of Education and Student Affairs, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4165-9114
Paul SchmidleDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4257-1659
Leon PielageInstitute for Geoinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0933-6424
Henriette SchulzeInstitute of Education and Student Affairs, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4364-7141
Ole HätscherInstitute of Education and Student Affairs, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1410-4023
Sonja StänderDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3612-7786
Bernhard MarschallInstitute of Education and Student Affairs, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1354-8687
Stephan Alexander BraunDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5600-0195
medicaltr.AI.ning Consortium
University of Münster · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 16DHBKI077University of Münster
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnological advances in the field of virtual reality (VR) offer new opportunities in many areas of life, including medical education. The University of Münster has been using VR scenarios in the education of medical students for several years, especially for situations that are difficult to reproduce in reality (e.g., brain death). Due to the consistently positive feedback from students, a dermatological VR scenario for skin cancer screening was developed.

objectivesPresentation and first evaluation of the skin cancer screening VR scenario to determine to what extent the technical implementation of the scenario was evaluated overall by the students and how their subjective competence to perform a skin cancer screening changed over the course of the teaching unit (theory seminar, VR scenario, theoretical debriefing).

methodsStudents (n = 140) participating in the curricular pilot project during the 2023 summer term were surveyed throughout the teaching unit using several established questionnaires (System Usability Scale, Simulation Task-Load-Index, Realism and Presence Questionnaire) as well as additional questions on cybersickness and subjective learning.

results(i) The use of VR is technically feasible, (ii) students evaluate the VR scenario as a useful curricular supplement, and (iii) from the students' subjective perspective, a good learning outcome is achieved. Although preparation and follow-up appear to be important for overall learning, the greatest increase in subjective competence to perform a skin cancer screening is achieved by the VR scenario.

conclusionsTechnically feasible and positively evaluated by students, VR can already be a useful addition to dermatology education, although costs are still high. As a visual discipline, dermatology offers special opportunities to create VR scenarios that are not always available or comfortable for patients in reality. Additionally, VR scenarios guarantee the same conditions for all students, which is essential for a high-quality education.

Indexed as

DermatologyEarly Detection of CancerSkin NeoplasmsVirtual RealityClinical CompetenceHumansPilot ProjectsStudents, MedicalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38497674
PMCPMC11587684
OpenAlexW4392917401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.