Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38497554›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

Characterization of the IDENTIFY

Janita Dekker, Sander van Het Schip, Marion Essers, Mariska de Smet, Martijn Kusters, Willy de Kruijf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Characterization of the IDENTIFYJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janita DekkerInstitute Verbeeten, Tilburg, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5759-7114
Sander van Het SchipInstitute Verbeeten, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Marion EssersInstitute Verbeeten, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Mariska de SmetInstitute Verbeeten, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Martijn KustersRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Willy de KruijfInstitute Verbeeten, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn radiation therapy, surface guidance can be used for patient setup and intra-fraction motion monitoring. The surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) system from Varian Medical systems, IDENTIFY

methodsPhantom measurements were performed to assess the accuracy, precision, reproducibility and temporal stability of the system, both in align and in load position. Translations of the phantoms in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical direction, and rotations around three axes (pitch, roll and yaw) were performed with an accurate, in-house built, positioning stage. Different phantom geometries and different surface colors were used, and various ambient light intensities were tested.

resultsThe accuracy of the IDENTIFY

conclusionThe IDENTIFY

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, Image-GuidedHumansPatient PositioningPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of Resultsaccuracyphantom measurementssurface guided radiation therapytechnical performance

Identifiers

PMID38497554
PMCPMC11005961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.