ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Social Risk Groups in Patients With Diabetes With Differing Eye Care Utilization and Vision Outcomes.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pilot Community Health Worker-Based Intervention to Address Social Determinants of Health Among Patients with Diabetes in Ophthalmology.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- The Association of Lapses in Diabetic Retinopathy Care with Vision Impairment.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Patients' Perspectives on Social Barriers to Care and the Acceptability and Impact of a Community Health Worker Program in Outpatient Ophthalmology.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether latent class analysis on social determinants of health (SDoH) data can identify social risk groups that differ by adverse SDoH and vision outcomes in patients with diabetes. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of adults ≥18 years with diabetes who completed a SDoH survey. Latent class analysis was used to cluster patients into social risk groups. The association of social risk group and severity of diabetic retinopathy, history of lapses in diabetic retinopathy care, and visual acuity was evaluated. Results: A total of 1006 participants were included. The three social risk groups differed by sociodemographic characteristics. The average age was 65, 60, and 54 in Groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Most (51%) patients in group 1 were non-Hispanic White, 66% in group 2 were non-Hispanic Black, and 80% in group 3 were Hispanic. Group 1 had the lowest burden of adverse SDoH per person (average 3.6), group 2 had 8.2, and group 3 had 10.5. In general, group 1 lacked diabetic retinopathy knowledge, group 2 had financial insecurity and difficulties with transportation, and group 3 had financial insecurity and did not have health insurance. Social risk group was associated with a history of lapses in diabetic retinopathy care, and presenting with worse vision. Conclusions and Translational Relevance: We identified distinct social risk groups among patients seeking care for diabetic retinopathy that differed by social needs, eye care utilization, and vision. Identifying these groups and their specific needs can help guide interventions to effectively address adverse SDoH and improve eye care utilization and vision outcomes among patients with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.