ArticleAnimal biotechnology2024
Analysing the genetic diversity of three sheep breeds in Turkey and nearby countries using 50 K SNPs data.
Article in Animal biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unravelling the genetic structure and genetic relationships of indigenous Greek sheep breeds using SNP markers.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Putative Genomic Signatures of Local Adaptation in Five Local Indonesian Sheep Reveal Selection on Immunity, Reproduction, and Production Traits.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of population structure and genomic diversity in fifteen Anatolian sheep breeds.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Assessment of genome-wide genetic variability and population divergence of four native Turkish sheep breeds.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Genome-wide genetic characterization and selection signatures in Anatolian Merino sheep.Archives animal breeding · 2025Article
- Assessment of breeding nuclei contributions to the genetic diversity and population structure of the Cyprus Chios sheep.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study analysed the genetic diversity and population structure of eight sheep breeds in Turkey and nearby countries. Moderate genetic diversity was observed, with the Sakiz (SKZ) exhibiting the highest diversity based on heterozygosity and allelic richness (AR) values. Genetic distances revealed differentiation between the populations, with the most significant divergence between the Cyprus Fat Tail (CFT) and SKZ breeds. PCA demonstrated SKZ and Chios (CHI) clustering together, indicating genetic similarity. Karakas (KRS), Norduz (NDZ), Afshari (AFS), Moghani (MOG) and others showed overlap, reflecting genetic relationships. Ancestry analysis found that KRS was predominantly inherited from the second ancestral population, while SKZ and NDZ were primarily derived from the first and second ancestral lineages. This illustrated the populations' diverse origins. Most genetic variation (96.84%) was within, not between, populations. The phi-statistic (PhiPT) indicated moderate differentiation overall. Phylogenetic analysis further demonstrated the genetic distinctiveness of the SKZ breed. ROH and FROH analyses showed that SKZ exhibited the highest homozygosity and inbreeding, while KRS displayed the lowest. This study elucidates these breeds' genetic diversity, structure and relationships. Key findings include moderate diversity, evidence of differentiation between breeds, diverse ancestral origins and distinct ROH patterns. This provides insights into the population's genetic characteristics and conservation requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.