ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024
More than a colour; how pigment influences colourblind microbes.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conservation and diversity of genes expressed in the spines of the sea urchin.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Structural and molecular distinctions of primary and secondary spines in the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A molecular basis for spine color morphs in the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Sculpting the microbiome.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many animals have pigments when they themselves cannot see colour. Perhaps those pigments enable the animal to avoid predators, or to attract mates. Maybe even those pigmented surfaces are hosts for microbes, even when the microbes do not see colour. Do some pigments then serve as a chemical signal for a good or bad microbial substrate? Maybe pigments attract or repel various microbe types? Echinoderms serve as an important model to test the mechanisms of pigment-based microbial interactions. Echinoderms are marine benthic organisms, ranging from intertidal habitats to depths of thousands of metres and are exposed to large varieties of microbes. They are also highly pigmented, with a diverse variety of colours between and even within species. Here we focus on one type of pigment (naphthoquinones) made by polyketide synthase, modified by flavin-dependent monoxygenases, and on one type of function, microbial interaction. Recent successes in targeted gene inactivation by CRISPR/Cas9 in sea urchins supports the contention that colour is more than it seems. Here we dissect the players, and their interactions to better understand how such host factors influence a microbial colonization. This article is part of the theme issue 'Sculpting the microbiome: how host factors determine and respond to microbial colonization'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.