Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38497053›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

Long-term continuous instrumented insole-based gait analyses in daily life have advantages over longitudinal gait analyses in the lab to monitor healing of tibial fractures.

Elke Warmerdam, Christian Wolff, Marcel Orth, Tim Pohlemann, Bergita Ganse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. [Sensor-based monitoring of fracture healing].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elke WarmerdamWerner Siemens-Endowed Chair for Innovative Implant Development (Fracture Healing), Departments and Institutes of Surgery, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Christian WolffGerman Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Saarbrücken, Germany.
Marcel OrthDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Departments and Institutes of Surgery, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Tim PohlemannDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Departments and Institutes of Surgery, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Bergita GanseWerner Siemens-Endowed Chair for Innovative Implant Development (Fracture Healing), Departments and Institutes of Surgery, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Saarland University · DESiemens (Germany) · DEGerman Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

digital medicinefractureground reaction forceinjurypedographypostoperative treatmentrehabilitationwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID38497053
PMCPMC10940326
OpenAlexW4392352180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.