Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38497047›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2024

Machine learning model to predict evolution of pulseless electrical activity during in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Jon Urteaga, Andoni Elola, Anders Norvik, Eirik Unneland, Trygve C Eftestøl, Abhishek Bhardwaj, David Buckler, Benjamin S Abella, Eirik Skogvoll, Elisabete Aramendi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jon UrteagaCommunications Engineering Department, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo 1, 48013 Bilbao, Spain.
Andoni ElolaDepartment of Electronic Technology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo 1, 48013 Bilbao, Spain.
Anders NorvikDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Prinsesse Kristinas gate 3, 7030 Trondheim, Norway.
Eirik UnnelandDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Prinsesse Kristinas gate 3, 7030 Trondheim, Norway.
Trygve C EftestølDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Stavanger (UiS), Kjell Arholms gate 41, 4021 Stavanger, Norway.
Abhishek BhardwajUniversity of California, 900 University Ave, Riverside, CA 92521, United State.
David BucklerIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029, United States.
Benjamin S AbellaUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United State.
Eirik SkogvollDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Prinsesse Kristinas gate 3, 7030 Trondheim, Norway.
Elisabete AramendiCommunications Engineering Department, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo 1, 48013 Bilbao, Spain.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity of the Basque Country · ESIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Stavanger · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: During pulseless electrical activity (PEA) the cardiac mechanical and electrical functions are dissociated, a phenomenon occurring in 25-42% of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) cases. Accurate evaluation of the likelihood of a PEA patient transitioning to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) may be vital for the successful resuscitation. The aim: We sought to develop a model to automatically discriminate between PEA rhythms with favorable and unfavorable evolution to ROSC. Methods: A dataset of 190 patients, 120 with ROSC, were acquired with defibrillators from different vendors in three hospitals. The ECG and the transthoracic impedance (TTI) signal were processed to compute 16 waveform features. Logistic regression models where designed integrating both automated features and characteristics annotated in the QRS to identify PEAs with better prognosis leading to ROSC. Cross validation techniques were applied, both patient-specific and stratified, to evaluate the performance of the algorithm. Results: The best model consisted in a three feature algorithm that exhibited median (interquartile range) Area Under the Curve/Balanced accuracy/Sensitivity/Specificity of 80.3(9.9)/75.6(8.0)/ 77.4(15.2)/72.3(16.4) %, respectively. Conclusions: Information hidden in the waveforms of the ECG and TTI signals, along with QRS complex features, can predict the progression of PEA. Automated methods as the one proposed in this study, could contribute to assist in the targeted treatment of PEA in IHCA.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)Evolution predictionMachine Learning modelsPulseless electrical activity (PEA)

Identifiers

PMID38497047
PMCPMC10940985
OpenAlexW4392600881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.