ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Analysis of characteristics of movement disorders in patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic performance of the Philippine Children's Medical Center clinical criteria for pediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis: a retrospective validation in a national referral center.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- Isolated orofacial dystonia and facial pain as the inaugural manifestation of anti-NMDAR encephalitis: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Seronegative Autoimmune Encephalitis Presenting With Severe Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in an Older Adult: A Case of Diagnostic Complexity.Case reports in psychiatry · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Attempts.Neurology international · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Movement disorders (MDs) are common in anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis but are poorly studied. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of MDs and the clinical differences between patients with and without MDs in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis who were first diagnosed and treated in the First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province from January 2017 to September 2022. According to the presence or absence of MDs, all patients were divided into two groups, and the clinical manifestations, auxiliary examinations, and prognosis of the two groups were compared. Patients in the MDs group were further subgrouped by different ages (<12 years, 12-17 years, and ≥ 18 years) and genders, and the prevalence of each MD was compared in different age and gender groups. Results: (1) In our study there were 64 patients, of whom 76.6% (49/64) presented with MDs; the median age of onset in patients with MDs was 21 (15,35) years and 65.3% (32/49) were female. The three most common MDs were orofacial dyskinesia (OFLD) (67.3%), dystonia (55.1%), and stereotypies (34.7%). Patients <12 years were more likely to experience chorea than patients in other age groups ( Conclusion: MDs associated with anti-NMDAR encephalitis were predominantly hyperkinetic. Chorea occurred more commonly in patients aged <12 years. Patients with MDs were prone to autonomic dysfunction, consciousness disorders, pulmonary infection, and gastrointestinal dysfunction; they had more intense inflammation, more severe disease, and a poorer short-term prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.