Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38496908›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2024

Glioblastoma in the oldest old: Clinical characteristics, therapy, and outcome in patients aged 80 years and older.

Christina Stadler, Dorothee Gramatzki, Emilie Le Rhun, Andreas F Hottinger, Thomas Hundsberger, Ulrich Roelcke, Heinz Läubli, Silvia Hofer, Katharina Seystahl, Hans-Georg Wirsching and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Targeting BRD4-A Promising Therapeutic Option for Glioblastoma?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Environmental Hazards and Glial Brain Tumors: Association or Causation?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nanotherapy of Glioblastoma-Where Hope Grows.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina StadlerDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dorothee GramatzkiDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9054-5498
Emilie Le RhunDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9408-3278
Andreas F HottingerDepartments of Oncology & Clinical Neurosciences, Lundin Family Brain Tumor Research Center, Lausanne University Hospital & University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thomas HundsbergerDepartment of Neurology and Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Ulrich RoelckeCantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Heinz LäubliDivision of Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Silvia HoferDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Katharina SeystahlDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4072-5669
Hans-Georg WirschingDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael WellerDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1748-174X
Patrick RothDepartment of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3897-214X
University of Zurich · CHInserm · FRKantonsspital Aarau · CHUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of St.Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Incidence rates of glioblastoma in very old patients are rising. The standard of care for this cohort is only partially defined and survival remains poor. The aims of this study were to reveal current practice of tumor-specific therapy and supportive care, and to identify predictors for survival in this cohort. Methods: Patients aged 80 years or older at the time of glioblastoma diagnosis were retrospectively identified in 6 clinical centers in Switzerland and France. Demographics, clinical parameters, and survival outcomes were annotated from patient charts. Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to identify parameters associated with survival. Results: Of 107 patients, 45 were diagnosed by biopsy, 30 underwent subtotal resection, and 25 had gross total resection. In 7 patients, the extent of resection was not specified. Postoperatively, 34 patients did not receive further tumor-specific treatment. Twelve patients received radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide, but only 2 patients had maintenance temozolomide therapy. Fourteen patients received temozolomide alone, 35 patients received radiotherapy alone, 1 patient received bevacizumab, and 1 took part in a clinical trial. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 months and median overall survival (OS) was 4.2 months. Among patients who received any postoperative treatment, median PFS was 3.9 months and median OS was 7.2 months. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70%, gross total resection, and combination therapy were associated with better outcomes. The median time spent hospitalized was 30 days, accounting for 23% of the median OS. End-of-life care was mostly provided by nursing homes ( Conclusions: In this cohort of very old patients diagnosed with glioblastoma, a large proportion was treated with best supportive care. Treatment beyond surgery and, in particular, combined modality treatment were associated with longer OS and may be considered for selected patients even at higher ages.

Indexed as

chemotherapyelderlygliomaradiotherapysurgery

Identifiers

PMID38496908
PMCPMC10940826
OpenAlexW4387803509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.