Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38496891›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Reviewing 3D convolutional neural network approaches for medical image segmentation.

Ademola E Ilesanmi, Taiwo O Ilesanmi, Babatunde O Ajayi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AI/ML-Assisted Detection ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ademola E IlesanmiUniversity of Pennsylvania, 3710 Hamilton Walk, 6th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
Taiwo O IlesanmiNational Population Commission, Abuja, Nigeria.
Babatunde O AjayiNational Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand, Chiang Mai 50180, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) assume pivotal roles in aiding clinicians in diagnosis and treatment decisions. The rapid evolution of imaging technology has established three-dimensional (3D) CNNs as a formidable framework for delineating organs and anomalies in medical images. The prominence of 3D CNN frameworks is steadily growing within medical image segmentation and classification. Thus, our proposition entails a comprehensive review, encapsulating diverse 3D CNN algorithms for the segmentation of medical image anomalies and organs. Methods: This study systematically presents an exhaustive review of recent 3D CNN methodologies. Rigorous screening of abstracts and titles were carried out to establish their relevance. Research papers disseminated across academic repositories were meticulously chosen, analyzed, and appraised against specific criteria. Insights into the realm of anomalies and organ segmentation were derived, encompassing details such as network architecture and achieved accuracies. Results: This paper offers an all-encompassing analysis, unveiling the prevailing trends in 3D CNN segmentation. In-depth elucidations encompass essential insights, constraints, observations, and avenues for future exploration. A discerning examination indicates the preponderance of the encoder-decoder network in segmentation tasks. The encoder-decoder framework affords a coherent methodology for the segmentation of medical images. Conclusion: The findings of this study are poised to find application in clinical diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. Despite inherent limitations, CNN algorithms showcase commendable accuracy levels, solidifying their potential in medical image segmentation and classification endeavors.

Indexed as

3D convolutional neural networkMedical imagesSegmentation of abnormalities and organs

Identifiers

PMID38496891
PMCPMC10944240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.