ArticleHeliyon2024
Soft tissue compensation evaluation in patients with facial asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography combined with 3D facial photographs.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Facial Asymmetry Determined by Linear Measurements According to Hand Preference and Gender.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Soft Tissue Facial Morphology in Growing Patients with Different Occlusal Classes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Investigating the Morphology of the Nasal Cavity for Nasal Reconstruction Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images : Morphology of the Nasal Cavity for Nasal Reconstruction.Galen medical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate bilateral soft tissue, hard and soft-tissue thickness at various anatomical levels in patients with facial asymmetries. Moreover, we attempted to find out correlation between soft-tissue compensation and severity of asymmetry by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) combined with 3D facial photographs. Study design: Based on menton deviation (MD), twenty-four subjects were divided into: mild-asymmetry group (n=12) and moderate-to-severe-asymmetry group (n = 12). CBCT images were superimposed with 3D facial photographs. Distance from the midsagittal plane to the outermost point of soft-tissue and hard-tissue were measured and calculated soft-tissue thickness. Comparison of soft-tissue thickness between deviated and contralateral side at any anatomical levels were performed within group, and correlation between bilateral soft-tissue thickness subtractions (soft-tissue compensation) and MD values was evaluated. Results: Within group, Soft- and hard-tissue distances were greater in deviated side than contralateral side at any levels. In moderate-to-severe group, significant differences were found at gonion and body of mandible level, whereas soft-tissue thickness was only found to be higher on deviated side at the level of mandibular ramus. Soft tissue compensation was negatively correlated with MD value at level of mandibular ramus (R = -0.5, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Asymmetry was found to be larger in the lower third of the face and was notably remarkable in the moderate-to-severe group. Soft-tissue thickness was thicker on the deviated side of the mandibular ramus. Thus, the soft-tissue compensation seems to be minimized in patients with more severe asymmetry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.