Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38496820›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2024

A Genomic Urine Assay for Surveillance of Patients with Bladder Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy.

Florus C de Jong, Iris G Iflé, Angelique C van der Made, Denise Kooper, Joep J de Jong, Martine Franckena, Tahlita C M Zuiverloon, Wim van Criekinge, Luca Incrocci, Ellen C Zwarthoff and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Florus C de JongDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Iris G IfléDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Angelique C van der MadeDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Denise KooperDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joep J de JongDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Martine FranckenaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tahlita C M ZuiverloonDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim van CriekingeLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Luca IncrocciDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ellen C ZwarthoffDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost L BoormansDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who receive radiotherapy with curative intent are followed by imaging, cystoscopy, and urine cytology. However, interpretation of cytology and cystoscopy is hampered by the impact of ionizing radiation on cells. Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of a genomic urine assay to detect urinary tract recurrences in patients with MIBC treated by (chemo)radiation. Design setting and participants: Patients with nonmetastatic MIBC who underwent (chemo)radiation with curative intent from 2016 to 2020 were prospectively included. Follow-up consisted of cystoscopy and upper tract imaging. Prior to cystoscopy, a urine sample was analyzed to assess mutations in the genes Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was a urinary tract recurrence. Cross-sectional sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were analyzed using a previously developed logistic regression model for the detection of bladder cancer with this assay. The secondary endpoint was the risk of a future urinary tract recurrence following a positive test and negative cystoscopy/imaging, using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazard analysis. Results and limitations: A total of 143 patients were included, and 503 urine samples were analyzed. The median study duration was 20 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 10-33), and the median time to a recurrence was 16 mo (IQR 12-26). In 27 patients, 32 urinary tract recurrences were diagnosed, including three upper tract tumors. Of 32 recurrences, 18 (56%) had a concomitant urine test available. The diagnostic model had an area under the curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.90) with corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and NPV of 78 (95% CI 52-94), 77% (95% CI 73-81), and 99% (95% CI 97-100). When taking into account the anticipatory effect of the test, 28/32 (88%) recurrences were detected. A Cox regression analysis showed a hazard ratio of 14.8 for the development of a future recurrence ( Conclusions: A genomic urine assay detected urinary tract recurrences after (chemo)radiation in patients with MIBC, and a positive test was strongly associated with future recurrences. Although validation in a large cohort is warranted, the test has the potential to limit frequent cystoscopies. Patient summary: Radiotherapy is a bladder-sparing treatment in patients with bladder cancer. After treatment, these patients undergo visual inspection of the bladder by cystoscopy to detect possible recurrences. However, interpretation of cystoscopy is difficult due to the effects of radiation on the bladder lining. Hence, we analyzed the diagnostic value of a molecular urine test to detect recurrent disease in bladder cancer patients treated by radiotherapy, and we showed that the urine test has the potential to limit the number of cystoscopies.

Indexed as

Biological assayBladder cancerCytologyProgressionRadiation therapyRecurrenceUrine specimen

Identifiers

PMID38496820
PMCPMC10940129
OpenAlexW4392671032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.