ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
CBCT vs panoramic radiography in assessment of impacted upper canine and root resorption of the adjacent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Permanent Canine Impaction: A Systematic Review of Incidence, Distribution, and Etiology.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- American Dental Association and American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology patient selection for dental radiography and cone-beam computed tomography: Clinical recommendations.Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2026Guideline
- American Dental Association and American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology patient selection for dental radiography and cone-beam computed tomography: Clinical recommendations.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2026Guideline
- Evolution of deep learning tooth segmentation from CT/CBCT images: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) in adolescent patients with class II malocclusion undergoing treatment with rigid and hybrid fixed functional appliances: a randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of the Position of Impacted Maxillary Canines on Panoramic Radiographs Using Deep Learning with CBCT as the Reference Standard.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical Challenges in the Management of Complex Tooth Impaction and Transposition: A Case Series.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Contribution of cone-beam computed tomography to the evaluation of lesions resulting from multiple myeloma and to the early diagnosis of the disease: A scoping review.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Review
- Evaluation of panoramic radiography for artificial intelligence-based assessment of impacted maxillary canines using cone-beam computed tomography as reference.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Can Panoramic Radiography Reliably Detect Root Resorption From Impacted Maxillary Canines?Cureus · 2026Article
- The Role of Five Prognostic Factors in the Eruption of Palatally Impacted Canines Following Diode Laser Disinclusion: A Case Series Study.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Two-Dimensional Radiographic Diagnosis of Maxillary Canine Impactions.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- A hierarchical deep learning approach for diagnosing impacted canine-induced root resorption via cone-beam computed tomography.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the Relationship between Impacted Maxillary Canine Teeth and Root Resorption in Adjacent Teeth: A Cross-Sectional Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The IC may cause reabsorption of adjacent teeth; therefore detailed assessment of its position would enhance decision-making in the clinical workflow. The objective was to compare cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic radiography (PR) in assessing the position of the impacted upper canine (IC) and root resorption of adjacent teeth. Material and Methods: Pubmed, EMBASE, Science Direct, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases were searched for studies published before August 2023. Studies that evaluated IC by using both imaging methods were included. For statistical analysis, the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (Biostat; Englewood, NJ) was used, p≤0.05. Results: A total of 17 articles were included, with 877 patients (average age of 17.6 years) and 1,115 ICs. The most frequent mesio-distal location of the IC was in sectors 3 and 4. The meta-analysis was performed with eleven studies. CBCT was more accurate in determining the labio-palatal position compared with PR ( Conclusions: CBCT showed statistically significant differences compared to PR in the assessment of IC position and root resorption of adjacent teeth. CBCT provided clinically relevant information that may contribute to diagnosing and planning IC treatment when PR was not sufficient.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.