Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38496781›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2024

Utility of artificial intelligence in a binary classification of soft tissue tumors.

Jing Di, Caylin Hickey, Cody Bumgardner, Mustafa Yousif, Mauricio Zapata, Therese Bocklage, Bonnie Balzer, Marilyn M Bui, Jerad M Gardner, Liron Pantanowitz and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Toward Optimizing the Impact of Digital Pathology and Augmented Intelligence on Issues of Diagnosis, Grading, Staging, and Classification.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jing DiUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Caylin HickeyUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Cody BumgardnerUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Mustafa YousifUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Mauricio ZapataNorthside Hospital, Georgia, United States.
Therese BocklageUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Bonnie BalzerCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Marilyn M BuiMoffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Jerad M GardnerGeisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, United States.
Liron PantanowitzUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Shadi A QasemUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soft tissue tumors (STTs) pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their rarity, complexity, and morphological overlap. Accurate differentiation between benign and malignant STTs is important to set treatment directions, however, this task can be difficult. The integration of machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) models can potentially be helpful in classifying these tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate AI and machine learning tools in the classification of STT into benign and malignant categories. This study consisted of three components: (1) Evaluation of whole-slide images (WSIs) to classify STT into benign and malignant entities. Five specialized soft tissue pathologists from different medical centers independently reviewed 100 WSIs, representing 100 different cases, with limited clinical information and no additional workup. The results showed an overall concordance rate of 70.4% compared to the reference diagnosis. (2) Identification of cell-specific parameters that can distinguish benign and malignant STT. Using an image analysis software (QuPath) and a cohort of 95 cases, several cell-specific parameters were found to be statistically significant, most notably cell count, nucleus/cell area ratio, nucleus hematoxylin density mean, and cell max caliper. (3) Evaluation of machine learning library (Scikit-learn) in differentiating benign and malignant STTs. A total of 195 STT cases (156 cases in the training group and 39 cases in the validation group) achieved approximately 70% sensitivity and specificity, and an AUC of 0.68. Our limited study suggests that the use of WSI and AI in soft tissue pathology has the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and identify parameters that can differentiate between benign and malignant STTs. We envision the integration of AI as a supportive tool to augment the pathologists' diagnostic capabilities.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningDiagnosisDigital pathologySarcomaSoft tissue tumorsWhole-slide images

Identifiers

PMID38496781
PMCPMC10940995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.