Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38496711›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024

Exploring pregnant individuals' counseling needs regarding urgent imaging to rule out pulmonary embolism.

Suzie Ouellet, Sandrine Hamel, Camille Simard, Maral Koolian, Antony Robert, Karen Wou, Stéphanie Lam, Amal Bessissow, Sarah St-Georges, Vicky Tagalakis and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Patient counseling for pulmonary embolism requires an individualized approach.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Suzie OuelletDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Sandrine HamelDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Camille SimardDepartment of Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Maral KoolianDepartment of Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Antony RobertDepartment of Emergency Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Karen WouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Stéphanie LamDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Amal BessissowDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Sarah St-GeorgesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Vicky TagalakisDepartment of Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Alexandra de PokomandyDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Linda SnellDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Ning-Zi SunDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Isabelle MalhaméDepartment of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
McGill University Health Centre · CAJewish General Hospital · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram and lung scintigraphy with ventilation/perfusion scan are needed to diagnose pulmonary embolism (PE) in pregnancy. Their associated ionizing radiation doses are considered safe in pregnancy. A standardized patient information tool may improve patient counseling and reduce testing hesitancy. Objectives: In this context, we sought to address 1) what patients want to know before undergoing these tests and 2) how they want the information to be provided to them. Methods: We used a qualitative descriptive methodology. We recruited pregnant participants at the McGill University Health Center in Montreal, Canada. Structured interviews explored information needs about PE and diagnostic imaging for PE. The interview transcripts' themes were analyzed with a hybrid deductive and inductive approach. Results: Of 21 individuals approached, 20 consented to participate. Four had been previously investigated for PE. Participants requested information about the risks associated with PE and radiation and their effects on maternal and fetal health. They preferred for radiation doses to be presented in comparison with known radiation thresholds for fetal harm. They suggested that a written tool should be developed using an accessible language. Participants also indicated that the tool would be integrated into their decision-making process, emphasizing a lower risk tolerance for their fetus than for themselves. Conclusion: This single-center group of pregnant patients wished to be informed about the risks of PE and radiation associated with imaging. A written tool could help put information into context and facilitate decision making. These new insights may be used to inform counseling.

Indexed as

computed tomography angiographypatient educationpregnancypulmonary embolismradiationventilation-perfusion scan

Identifiers

PMID38496711
PMCPMC10943056
OpenAlexW4390928779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.