ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Generative interpolation and restoration of images using deep learning for improved 3D tissue mapping.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- COEXIST: Coordinated single-cell integration of serial multiplexed tissue images.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The development of novel imaging platforms has improved our ability to collect and analyze large three-dimensional (3D) biological imaging datasets. Advances in computing have led to an ability to extract complex spatial information from these data, such as the composition, morphology, and interactions of multi-cellular structures, rare events, and integration of multi-modal features combining anatomical, molecular, and transcriptomic (among other) information. Yet, the accuracy of these quantitative results is intrinsically limited by the quality of the input images, which can contain missing or damaged regions, or can be of poor resolution due to mechanical, temporal, or financial constraints. In applications ranging from intact imaging (e.g. light-sheet microscopy and magnetic resonance imaging) to sectioning based platforms (e.g. serial histology and serial section transmission electron microscopy), the quality and resolution of imaging data has become paramount. Here, we address these challenges by leveraging frame interpolation for large image motion (FILM), a generative AI model originally developed for temporal interpolation, for spatial interpolation of a range of 3D image types. Comparative analysis demonstrates the superiority of FILM over traditional linear interpolation to produce functional synthetic images, due to its ability to better preserve biological information including microanatomical features and cell counts, as well as image quality, such as contrast, variance, and luminance. FILM repairs tissue damages in images and reduces stitching artifacts. We show that FILM can decrease imaging time by synthesizing skipped images. We demonstrate the versatility of our method with a wide range of imaging modalities (histology, tissue-clearing/light-sheet microscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, serial section transmission electron microscopy), species (human, mouse), healthy and diseased tissues (pancreas, lung, brain), staining techniques (IHC, H&E), and pixel resolutions (8 nm, 2 μm, 1mm). Overall, we demonstrate the potential of generative AI in improving the resolution, throughput, and quality of biological image datasets, enabling improved 3D imaging.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.