Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38496455›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Rectal Swab DNA Collection Protocol for PCR Genotyping in Rats.

Audrey E Kaye, Jacob W Proctor-Bonbright, Jai Y Yu

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Audrey E KayeNeuroscience Institute, University of Chicago.ORCID 0009-0001-8580-7975
Jacob W Proctor-BonbrightNeuroscience Institute, University of Chicago.
Jai Y YuNeuroscience Institute, University of Chicago.ORCID 0000-0003-0628-2531
University of Chicago · US

Funding

University of Chicago Neuroscience Early Stage Scientist Training ProgramR25NS117360 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MASON, PEGGY, SCHWARTZ, NANCY B · 2020 to 2024
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS117360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA collection is essential for genotyping laboratory animals. However, common collection methods require tissue amputation, causing discomfort and injury. Rectal swabbing has been proposed as an effective non-invasive alternative, but an evidence-backed protocol for the technique remains unavailable. We evaluate the effect of collection parameters on PCR result quality and present a genotyping protocol that can yield results for a litter of rats within 3-5 hours. We found that samples with 2-8 scrapes produced enough DNA to amplify targets up to ~1800bp long using PCR. Rectal swabbing produced PCR results with similar quality to ear clip samples, and results were unaffected by residual fecal matter or cell debris. Our protocol enables fast, non-invasive, and repeatable genotyping using commercial PCR reagents.

Indexed as

DNA collectionDNA collection protocolgenotypingnon-invasivePCR analysispolymerase chain reactionsrectal swabrectum swabsamplingtransgenic rats

Identifiers

PMID38496455
PMCPMC10942286
OpenAlexW4392515538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.