ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2024
Validation of the Hungarian version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ).
Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Iranian Translation of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) is a self-administered, reliable and valid instrument which assess knowledge regarding urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. There is no validated Hungarian version of this questionnaire; therefore the aim of this study was to develop a reliable, valid and culturally sensitive Hungarian version of the PIKQ. Study design: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to October 2022 with a sample of 459 women. The PIKQ, which consists of the urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse scales, was translated into Hungarian in accordance with international guidelines. The validity and reliability of the final version of the Hungarian PIKQ was evaluated using construct validity, comparison with known-groups, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: Regarding construct validity, all fit indices were found acceptable. Healthcare workers had significantly higher knowledge about urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (p < 0.001) compared to women who had not worked in a medical field. The Hungarian PIKQ had an adequate internal consistency with Cronbach alpha of 0.785 for the urinary incontinence scale and 0.826 for the pelvic organ prolapse scale. The correlation coeffcients between the test and retest was 0.931 for the urinary incontinence scale and 0.964 for the pelvic organ prolapse scale. Conclusion: The Hungarian version of the PIKQ is a reliable and valid tool to measure the level of knowledge about urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse among Hungarian speaking women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.