ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024
Case Report: Ventricular preexcitation-induced dilated cardiomyopathy improved by the pharmacologic suppression of ventricular preexcitation in three infants, and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic nutritional index in retinopathy of prematurity: a potential indicator of disease severity?International ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The therapy of ventricular preexcitation-induced dilated cardiomyopathy in very small infants or infants with a high risk of ablation is tough and related articles are rare. Effective pharmacotherapy to suppress ventricular preexcitation is valuable. Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapy for cardiac resynchronization in infants with ventricular preexcitation-induced dilated cardiomyopathy. Methods and results: Three infants with ventricular preexcitation-induced dilated cardiomyopathy, due to the disappearance of ventricular preexcitation during the placement of catheter, intermittent WPW pattern, and right mid septal accessory pathway respectively, had received pharmacotherapy for cardiac resynchronization. The initial dosage of oral amiodarone was 5 mg/kg.d and it was followed by the maintenance dosage of 2-2.5 mg/kg.d 4 weeks later. Propafenone (15 mg/kg.d) served as a supplement since amiodarone was not adequate in case 3. The three infants achieved successful pharmacologic suppression of ventricular preexcitation 10, 6.5, and 4.5 weeks after the initiation of amiodarone respectively. They all got normalized contraction of interventricular septum and LVEF as well as reduced LVEDD gradually after the disappearance of ventricular preexcitation. No side effects associated with pharmacotherapy happened during the follow-up. Amiodarone had been withdrawn for 2 years and 5 months in Cases 1 and 2. They both remained free from ventricular preexcitation and retained normal LVEF and LVEDD. Conclusions: Pharmacotherapy for cardiac resynchronization with oral amiodarone or in combination with propafenone for infants with ventricular preexcitation-induced dilated cardiomyopathy is effective and safe. Pharmacotherapy for cardiac resynchronization served as another therapeutic choice besides ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.