ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental immunology2024
cfDNA from maternal plasma for noninvasive screening of fetal exomes.
Article in American journal of clinical and experimental immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, a shift in prenatal screening methods has been observed, moving away from traditional approaches such as ultrasound and maternal serologic markers towards the utilization of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) based on cfDNA extracted from peripheral blood. This cutting-edge technology has established itself as the primary screening method, attributed to its superior detection rate and reduced false-positive rate. Although NIPT predominantly focuses on screening for chromosomal abnormalities, it currently does not encompass the identification of single-gene disorders. Considering that single-gene disorders contribute significantly to birth defects, accounting for 7.5% to 12% of cases, it becomes imperative to integrate screening for single-gene disorders into the birth defect prevention and control system. This study aims to provide a succinct overview of the recent advancements in NIPT specifically tailored for monogenic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38496357PMC10944361W4394739750What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.