Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38496340›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2024

Cost-effectiveness of One Health intervention to reduce risk of human exposure and infection with non-typhoidal salmonellosis (NTS) in Nigeria.

Abdullahi O Sanni, Annelize Jonker, Vincent Were, Olubunmi G Fasanmi, Oluwawemimo O Adebowale, Aminu Shittu, Abdurrahman H Jibril, Folorunso O Fasina

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Abdullahi O SanniDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Annelize JonkerDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
Vincent WereAdaptive Model for Research and Empowerment in Communities (AMREC), Nairobi, Kenya.
Olubunmi G FasanmiDepartment of Veterinary Laboratory Technology, Federal College of Animal Health & Production Technology, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Oluwawemimo O AdebowaleDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Aminu ShittuDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria.
Abdurrahman H JibrilDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria.
Folorunso O FasinaDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.
University of Pretoria · ZAUsmanu Danfodiyo University · NGFederal University of Agriculture · NGOnderstepoort Veterinary Academic Hospital · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Non-typhoidal Methods: Using a customized Excel-based cost-effectiveness analysis tool, structured (One Health) and unstructured (episodic intervention against NTS) in Nigeria were evaluated. Input data on the disease burdens, costs surveillance, response and control of NTS were obtained from validated sources and the public health system. Results: The non-complicated and complicated cases were 309,444 (95%) and 16,287 (5%) respectively, and the overall programme cost was US$ 31,375,434.38. The current non-systematic episodic intervention costed US$ 14,913,480.36, indicating an additional US$ 16,461,954 to introduce the proposed intervention. The intervention will avert 4036.98 NTS DALYs in a single year. The non-complicated NTS case was US$ 60/person with significant rise in complicated cases. The cumulative costs of NTS with and without complications far outweighed the program cost for One Health intervention with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -US$ 221.30). Conclusions: Utilising structured One Health intervention is cost-effective against NTS in Nigeria, it carries additional mitigative benefits for other diseases and is less costly and more effective, indicative of a superior health system approach. Identified limitations must be improved to optimize benefits associated and facilitate policy discussions and resource allocation.

Indexed as

Cost-effectiveness analysisDisease outbreakHumanNigeriaNon-typhoidal SalmonellaOne Health

Identifiers

PMID38496340
PMCPMC10940793
OpenAlexW4392499927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.