Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38496243›Full record

ArticleBiophysics and physicobiology2023

Quantitative analysis of protein dynamics using a deep learning technique combined with experimental cryo-EM density data and MD simulations.

Shigeyuki Matsumoto, Shoichi Ishida, Kei Terayama, Yasuhshi Okuno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysics and physicobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shigeyuki MatsumotoGraduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Shoichi IshidaGraduate School of Medical Life Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Kei TerayamaGraduate School of Medical Life Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Yasuhshi OkunoGraduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein functions associated with biological activity are precisely regulated by both tertiary structure and dynamic behavior. Thus, elucidating the high-resolution structures and quantitative information on in-solution dynamics is essential for understanding the molecular mechanisms. The main experimental approaches for determining tertiary structures include nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), X-ray crystallography, and cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM). Among these procedures, recent remarkable advances in the hardware and analytical techniques of cryo-EM have increasingly determined novel atomic structures of macromolecules, especially those with large molecular weights and complex assemblies. In addition to these experimental approaches, deep learning techniques, such as AlphaFold 2, accurately predict structures from amino acid sequences, accelerating structural biology research. Meanwhile, the quantitative analyses of the protein dynamics are conducted using experimental approaches, such as NMR and hydrogen-deuterium mass spectrometry, and computational approaches, such as molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Although these procedures can quantitatively explore dynamic behavior at high resolution, the fundamental difficulties, such as signal crowding and high computational cost, greatly hinder their application to large and complex biological macromolecules. In recent years, machine learning techniques, especially deep learning techniques, have been actively applied to structural data to identify features that are difficult for humans to recognize from big data. Here, we review our approach to accurately estimate dynamic properties associated with local fluctuations from three-dimensional cryo-EM density data using a deep learning technique combined with MD simulations.

Indexed as

3D-CNNallosterybig datamachine learningsingle particle analysis

Identifiers

PMID38496243
PMCPMC10941960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.