ArticleRegenerative therapy2024
Determining the recurrence rate of premature ventricular complexes and idiopathic ventricular tachycardia after radiofrequency catheter ablation with the help of designing a machine-learning model.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Three-Year Heart Failure and Mortality After Premature Ventricular Contraction Ablation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Interpretable Clinical Decision-Making Application for Etiological Diagnosis of Ventricular Tachycardia Based on Machine Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- AI's pivotal impact on redefining stakeholder roles and their interactions in medical education and health care.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventricular arrhythmias increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Recurrent PVCs and IVT are generally considered benign in the absence of structural heart abnormalities. Artificial intelligence is a rapidly growing field. In recent years, medical professionals have shown great interest in the potential use of ML, an integral part of AI, in various disciplines, including diagnostic applications, decision-making, prognostic stratification, and solving complex pathophysiological aspects of diseases from these data at extraordinary complexity, scale, and acquisition rate. The aim of this study was to design an ML model to predict the probability of PVC and IVT recurrence after RF ablation. Data of patients were collected and manipulated using traditional analysis and various artificial intelligence models, namely MLP, Gradient Boosting Machines, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression. Hypertension, male sex, and the use of non-irrigate catheters were associated with less freedom from arrhythmia. All these results were obtained through traditional analytic methods, and according to AI, none of the variables had a clear effect on the recurrence of arrhythmia. Each AI model presents unique strengths and weaknesses, and further optimization and fine-tuning of these models are necessary to increase their clinical utility. By expanding the dataset, improved predictions can be fostered to ultimately increase the clinical utility of AI in predicting PVC erosion outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.