ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2024
Twenty years of research on borderline personality disorder: a scientometric analysis of hotspots, bursts, and research trends.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Research hotspots and trends on NF-κB in cognitive impairment: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Bibliometrics in thyroid eye disease.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Mapping emotion-modulated inhibitory control in borderline personality features: a dimensional approach using the emotional Go/No-Go task with EEG.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2025Article
- Needs of Veterans With Personality Disorder Diagnoses in Community-Based Mental Health Care.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025Article
- Machine learning applied to mild cognitive impairment: bibliometric and visual analysis from 2015 to 2024.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Borderline personality: revisiting its classification as a neurodevelopmental disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
- Review
- Bibliometric analysis of research trends in the relationship between frailty and neoplasms over the past decade.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Decoding the research landscape of drug resistance and therapeutic approaches in head and neck cancer: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2023.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- "Empowering Hope: Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) Communities": Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Borderline personality disorder (BPD), a complex and severe psychiatric disorder, has become a topic of considerable interest to current researchers due to its high incidence and severity of consequences. There is a lack of a bibliometric analysis to visualize the history and developmental trends of researches in BPD. We retrieved 7919 relevant publications on the Web of Science platform and analyzed them using software CiteSpace (6.2.R4). The results showed that there has been an overall upward trend in research interest in BPD over the past two decades. Current research trends in BPD include neuroimaging, biological mechanisms, and cognitive, behavioral, and pathological studies. Recent trends have been identified as "prevention and early intervention", "non-pharmacological treatment" and "pathogenesis". The results are like a reference program that will help determine future research directions and priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.