Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38495864›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Biomedical laboratory scientists and technicians in digital pathology - Is there a need for professional development?

Charlotte Lerbech Jensen, Lisbeth Koch Thomsen, Mette Zeuthen, Sys Johnsen, Rima El Jashi, Michael Friberg Bruun Nielsen, Line E Hemstra, Julie Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charlotte Lerbech JensenCenter for Engineering and Science, Biomedical Laboratory Science, University College Absalon, Næstved, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0642-6251
Lisbeth Koch ThomsenCenter for Engineering and Science, Biomedical Laboratory Science, University College Absalon, Næstved, Denmark.
Mette ZeuthenDepartment of Technology, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sys JohnsenDepartment of Technology, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rima El JashiDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Physiotherapy and Radiography, Biomedical Laboratory Science, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark.
Michael Friberg Bruun NielsenDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Physiotherapy and Radiography, Biomedical Laboratory Science, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark.
Line E HemstraCenter for Engineering and Science, Biomedical Laboratory Science, University College Absalon, Næstved, Denmark.
Julie SmithDepartment of Technology, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1135-1191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Digital pathology (DP) is moving into Danish pathology departments at high pace. Conventionally, biomedical laboratory scientists (BLS) and technicians have prepared tissue sections for light microscopy, but workflow alterations are required for the new digital era with whole slide imaging (WSI); digitally assisted image analysis (DAIA) and artificial intelligence (AI). We aim to explore the role of BLS in DP and assess a potential need for professional development. Methods: We investigated the roles of BLS in the new digital era through qualitative interviews at Danish Pathology Departments in 2019/2020 before DP implementation (supported by a questionnaire); and in 2022 after DP implementation. Additionally, senior lecturers from three Danish University Colleges reported on how DP was integrated into the 2023 bachelor's degree educational curricula for BLS students. Results: At some Danish pathology departments, BLS were involved in the implementation process of DP and their greatest concerns were lack of physical laboratory requirements (69%) and implementation strategies (63%). BLS were generally positive towards working with DP, however, some expressed concern about extended working hours for scanning. Work-task transfers from pathologists were generally greeted positively from both management and pathologists; however, at follow-up interviews after DP implementation, job transfers had not been effectuated. At Danish university colleges, DP had been integrated systematically in the curricula for BLS students, especially WSI. Conclusion: Involving BLS in DP implementation and development may benefit the process, as BLS have a hands-on workflow perspective with a focus on quality assurance. Several new work opportunities for BLS may occur with DP including WSI, DAIA and AI, and therefore new qualifications are warranted, which must be considered in future undergraduate programmes for BLS students or postgraduate programmes for BLS.

Indexed as

clinical laboratory scientistDigital pathologymedical technologist

Identifiers

PMID38495864
PMCPMC10943708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.