Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38495846›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2024

Integrating 40-GEP Testing to Improve Clinical Recommendations for Adjuvant Radiation for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Multidisciplinary Consensus Guidelines.

Ramesh Gopal, Michael Marquardt, Gaurav Singh, Stanislav N Tolkachjov, Sarah T Arron

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ramesh GopalDr. Gopal is a radiation oncologist and Associate Professor of Radiation Oncology at the New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Michael MarquardtDr. Marquardt is a radiation oncologist at Hall-Perrine Cancer Center, in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
Gaurav SinghDr. Singh is a Board-certified dermatologist and Mohs surgeon in Wisconsin.
Stanislav N TolkachjovDr. Tolkachjov is a board-certified dermatologist and Mohs micrographic and reconstructive surgeon at Epiphany Dermatology in Lewisville, Texas; Clinical Assistant Professor at the Department of Dermatology at University of Texas at Southwestern in Dallas, Texas; Clinical Associate Professor at the Texas A&M School of Medicine in Dallas, Texas; and a core faculty for the dermatology residency at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas.
Sarah T ArronDr. Arron is a Board-certified dermatologist and Mohs micrographic and reconstructive surgeon at Peninsula Dermatology Medical Group in Burlingame, California.
Indian Health Board · USNew Mexico Cancer Center · USPeninsula Library System · USPhysicians' Clinic of Iowa · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early identification and intervention in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) who are at high risk for metastasis is important for optimal outcomes. Prognostic tools (e.g., American Joint Committee on Cancer, 8th edition [AJCC-8]) and management guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network® [NCCN]) are useful in helping to identify high-risk patients with cSCC who might benefit from adjuvant therapies, such as radiation and/or immunotherapies; however, traditional staging and management guidelines rely on clinicopathologic risk factors to predict risk, which limits their prognostic accuracy. Gene expression profiling (GEP) is a clinically available, objective metric that can be used in conjunction with traditional clinicopathological staging to help clinicians stratify risk in patients with cSCC. The validated 40-GEP test can accurately classify patients with at least one high-risk feature as being at low (Class 1), higher (Class 2A), or highest (Class 2B) biological risk of nodal or distant metastasis within three years of diagnosis. A multidisciplinary panel comprising radiation oncologists and dermatologists/Mohs micrographic surgeons with expertise in cSCC management convened in June 2023 to discuss the utility of 40-GEP testing in cSCC clinical decision-making in regard to adjuvant radiation therapy (ART). The panel identified gaps in clinical practice in which 40-GEP testing has particular utility: in escalation of care for lower-stage patients with high-risk tumors; in de-escalation of care for patients for whom the risks of ART may outweigh the benefits; and in decision-making regarding elective radiation to the nodal basin. The expert panel developed a risk-based clinical workflow for ART in patients with cSCC, utilizing 40-GEP testing within NCCN management guidelines and AJCC-8 staging.

Indexed as

40-GEPadjuvant radiation therapyconsensuscutaneous squamous cell carcinomagene expression profilingprognosisrisk of recurrencerisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID38495846
PMCPMC10939503
OpenAlexW4394760116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.