Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38495762›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Evaluation of different Kabuli chickpea genotypes against

Hafiz Muhammad Bilal Yousuf, Muhammad Yasin, Habib Ali, Khalid Naveed, Ammara Riaz, Amal Mohamed AlGarawi, Ashraf Atef Hatamleh, Yunfeng Shan

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Hafiz Muhammad Bilal Yousuf *Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Islamia University, Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad YasinDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Islamia University, Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
Habib AliDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4650-0345
Khalid NaveedDepartment of Entomology, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Depalpur Campus, Okara, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Ammara RiazDepartment of Life Sciences, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
Amal Mohamed AlGarawiDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ashraf Atef HatamlehDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yunfeng Shan *College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Guangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Laibin, China.
Islamia University of Bahawalpur · PKKhwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology · PKKing Saud University · SAJiangxi Science and Technology Normal University · CNUniversity of Faisalabad · PK

Funding

Guanxi Science and Technology Normal University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The chickpea pod borer Methods: Field experiments were conducted in Central Punjab, Pakistan, to investigate the impact of biotic and abiotic factors on pod borer population dynamics and infestation in nine kabuli chickpea genotypes during two cropping seasons (2020-2021 and 2021-2022). The crops were sown in November in both years, with row-to-row and plant-to-plant distances of 30 and 15 cm, respectively, following a randomized complete block design (RCBD). Results: Results showed a significant difference among the tested genotypes in trichome density, pod wall thickness, and leaf chlorophyll contents. Significantly lower larval population (0.85 and 1.10 larvae per plant) and percent damage (10.65% and 14.25%) were observed in genotype Noor-2019 during 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, respectively. Pod trichome density, pod wall thickness, and chlorophyll content of leaves also showed significant variation among the tested genotypes. Pod trichome density and pod wall thickness correlated negatively with larval infestation, while chlorophyll content in leaves showed a positive correlation. Additionally, the larval population positively correlated with minimum and maximum temperatures, while relative humidity negatively correlated with the larval population. Study results explore natural enemies as potential biological control agents and reduce reliance on chemical pesticides.

Indexed as

CicerMothsAnimalsChlorophyllCrops, AgriculturalGenotypeHelicoverpa armigeraLarvaChlorophyllAbiotic factorsChickpeaChlorophyll contentsGenetic resilienceGenotypesPhysio-morphic charactersTrichomes

Identifiers

PMID38495762
PMCPMC10944164
OpenAlexW4392751735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.