ArticlePeerJ2024
Construction of a predictive model for bone metastasis from first primary lung adenocarcinoma within 3 cm based on machine learning algorithm: a retrospective study.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Research Progress on Molecular Mechanisms and Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Spinal Organotropic Metastasis in Lung Adenocarcinoma].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for postoperative urinary retention after gynecologic abdominal-pelvic surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Radiomics and deep learning model based on X-ray imaging for the assisted diagnosis of early Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Article
- Establishment and validation of a prognostic risk early-warning model for retinoblastoma based on XGBoost.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adenocarcinoma, the most prevalent histological subtype of non-small cell lung cancer, is associated with a significantly higher likelihood of bone metastasis compared to other subtypes. The presence of bone metastasis has a profound adverse impact on patient prognosis. However, to date, there is a lack of accurate bone metastasis prediction models. As a result, this study aims to employ machine learning algorithms for predicting the risk of bone metastasis in patients. Method: We collected a dataset comprising 19,454 cases of solitary, primary lung adenocarcinoma with pulmonary nodules measuring less than 3 cm. These cases were diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 and were sourced from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Utilizing clinical feature indicators, we developed predictive models using seven machine learning algorithms, namely extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), logistic regression (LR), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and support vector machine (SVM). Results: The results demonstrated that XGBoost exhibited superior performance among the four algorithms (training set: AUC: 0.913; test set: AUC: 0.853). Furthermore, for convenient application, we created an online scoring system accessible at the following URL: https://www.xsmartanalysis.com/model/predict/?mid=731symbol=7Fr16wX56AR9Mk233917, which is based on the highest performing model. Conclusion: XGBoost proves to be an effective algorithm for predicting the occurrence of bone metastasis in patients with solitary, primary lung adenocarcinoma featuring pulmonary nodules below 3 cm in size. Moreover, its robust clinical applicability enhances its potential utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.