Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38495753›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Land potential assessment and trend-analysis using 2000-2021 FAPAR monthly time-series at 250 m spatial resolution.

Julia Hackländer, Leandro Parente, Yu-Feng Ho, Tomislav Hengl, Rolf Simoes, Davide Consoli, Murat Şahin, Xuemeng Tian, Martin Jung, Martin Herold and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia HackländerOpenGeoHub, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6433-0979
Leandro ParenteOpenGeoHub, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1589-0467
Yu-Feng HoOpenGeoHub, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Tomislav HenglOpenGeoHub, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9921-5129
Rolf SimoesOpenGeoHub, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0953-4132
Davide ConsoliOpenGeoHub, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4007-2896
Murat ŞahinOpenGeoHub, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Xuemeng TianOpenGeoHub, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Martin JungBiodiversity, Ecology and Conservation Research Group, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7569-1390
Martin HeroldWageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Gregory DuveillerMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC), Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6471-8404
Melanie WeynantsMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC), Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1447-0105
Ichsani WheelerOpenGeoHub, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Open University of the Netherlands · NLMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry · DEGFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences · DEInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis · AT

Funding

Bezos Earth FundEuropean Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The article presents results of using remote sensing images and machine learning to map and assess land potential based on time-series of potential Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR) composites. Land potential here refers to the potential vegetation productivity in the hypothetical absence of short-term anthropogenic influence, such as intensive agriculture and urbanization. Knowledge on this ecological land potential could support the assessment of levels of land degradation as well as restoration potentials. Monthly aggregated FAPAR time-series of three percentiles (0.05, 0.50 and 0.95 probability) at 250 m spatial resolution were derived from the 8-day GLASS FAPAR V6 product for 2000-2021 and used to determine long-term trends in FAPAR, as well as to model potential FAPAR in the absence of human pressure. CCa 3 million training points sampled from 12,500 locations across the globe were overlaid with 68 bio-physical variables representing climate, terrain, landform, and vegetation cover, as well as several variables representing human pressure including: population count, cropland intensity, nightlights and a human footprint index. The training points were used in an ensemble machine learning model that stacks three base learners (extremely randomized trees, gradient descended trees and artificial neural network) using a linear regressor as meta-learner. The potential FAPAR was then projected by removing the impact of urbanization and intensive agriculture in the covariate layers. The results of strict cross-validation show that the global distribution of FAPAR can be explained with an R

Indexed as

ClimateForestsAgricultureHumansSeasonsFAPARLand degradationLand potentialMachine learningNatural vegetationPrimary productivitySpatiotemporal modelingTrend analysis

Identifiers

PMID38495753
PMCPMC10944167
OpenAlexW4392751969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.