ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Glaucoma detection model by exploiting multi-region and multi-scan-pattern OCT images with dynamical region score.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative assessment of retinal attenuation and backscattering in OCT imaging using iterative layer-based analysis.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, deep learning-based methods have achieved success in glaucoma detection. However, most models focus on OCT images captured by a single scan pattern within a given region, holding the high risk of the omission of valuable features in the remaining regions or scan patterns. Therefore, we proposed a multi-region and multi-scan-pattern fusion model to address this issue. Our proposed model exploits comprehensive OCT images from three fundus anatomical regions (macular, middle, and optic nerve head regions) being captured by four scan patterns (radial, volume, single-line, and circular scan patterns). Moreover, to enhance the efficacy of integrating features across various scan patterns within a region and multiple regional features, we employed an attention multi-scan fusion module and an attention multi-region fusion module that auto-assign contribution to distinct scan-pattern features and region features adapting to characters of different samples, respectively. To alleviate the absence of available datasets, we have collected a specific dataset (MRMSG-OCT) comprising OCT images captured by four scan patterns from three regions. The experimental results and visualized feature maps both demonstrate that our proposed model achieves superior performance against the single scan-pattern models and single region-based models. Moreover, compared with the average fusion strategy, our proposed fusion modules yield superior performance, particularly reversing the performance degradation observed in some models relying on fixed weights, validating the efficacy of the proposed dynamic region scores adapted to different samples. Moreover, the derived region contribution scores enhance the interpretability of the model and offer an overview of the model's decision-making process, assisting ophthalmologists in prioritizing regions with heightened scores and increasing efficiency in clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.