Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38495692›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2024

Glaucoma detection model by exploiting multi-region and multi-scan-pattern OCT images with dynamical region score.

Kai Liu, Jicong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kai LiuSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Jicong ZhangSchool of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, deep learning-based methods have achieved success in glaucoma detection. However, most models focus on OCT images captured by a single scan pattern within a given region, holding the high risk of the omission of valuable features in the remaining regions or scan patterns. Therefore, we proposed a multi-region and multi-scan-pattern fusion model to address this issue. Our proposed model exploits comprehensive OCT images from three fundus anatomical regions (macular, middle, and optic nerve head regions) being captured by four scan patterns (radial, volume, single-line, and circular scan patterns). Moreover, to enhance the efficacy of integrating features across various scan patterns within a region and multiple regional features, we employed an attention multi-scan fusion module and an attention multi-region fusion module that auto-assign contribution to distinct scan-pattern features and region features adapting to characters of different samples, respectively. To alleviate the absence of available datasets, we have collected a specific dataset (MRMSG-OCT) comprising OCT images captured by four scan patterns from three regions. The experimental results and visualized feature maps both demonstrate that our proposed model achieves superior performance against the single scan-pattern models and single region-based models. Moreover, compared with the average fusion strategy, our proposed fusion modules yield superior performance, particularly reversing the performance degradation observed in some models relying on fixed weights, validating the efficacy of the proposed dynamic region scores adapted to different samples. Moreover, the derived region contribution scores enhance the interpretability of the model and offer an overview of the model's decision-making process, assisting ophthalmologists in prioritizing regions with heightened scores and increasing efficiency in clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID38495692
PMCPMC10942704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.