ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Enhanced model iteration algorithm with graph neural network for diffuse optical tomography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine-learning-enhanced image reconstruction in optical tomography using the Monte Carlo method for light transport.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse optical tomography (DOT) employs near-infrared light to reveal the optical parameters of biological tissues. Due to the strong scattering of photons in tissues and the limited surface measurements, DOT reconstruction is severely ill-posed. The Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) is a popular iteration method for DOT, however, it is computationally expensive and its reconstruction accuracy needs improvement. In this study, we propose a neural model based iteration algorithm which combines the graph neural network with Levenberg-Marquardt (GNNLM), which utilizes a graph data structure to represent the finite element mesh. In order to verify the performance of the graph neural network, two GNN variants, namely graph convolutional neural network (GCN) and graph attention neural network (GAT) were employed in the experiments. The results showed that GCNLM performs best in the simulation experiments within the training data distribution. However, GATLM exhibits superior performance in the simulation experiments outside the training data distribution and real experiments with breast-like phantoms. It demonstrated that the GATLM trained with simulation data can generalize well to situations outside the training data distribution without transfer training. This offers the possibility to provide more accurate absorption coefficient distributions in clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.