ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal2024
Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease.
Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Closing the Gap: Examining Representation of Women in Ischemic Heart Disease Guideline Studies.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Pooled it
- Participation of Women in Cardiovascular Trials From 2017 to 2023: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Periodontal disease and cardiovascular disease: umbrella review.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Inequities in access to life-saving cardiac devices for heart failure: a comparative analysis of Chile and Mexico.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Coronary artery surgery outcome differences by sex.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Review
- Emerging roles of spexin in cardiovascular homeostasis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Trends and disparities in obesity and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease mortality in a 25-year retrospective analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sex-related disparities in hyperlipidaemia and cardiovascular risk in Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional study.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Blood pressure reduction by gender and menopause status among hypertensive participants of a mobile health cardiovascular risk self-management program.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Do Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Face Higher Mortality on Weekends Versus Weekdays? A Comprehensive Analysis of Demographic, Geographic, and Temporal Trends in the United States.Clinical cardiology · 2025Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women. It remains underdiagnosed, undertreated, and portends worse outcomes in women than men. Disparities exist in every stage of science, from bench research to the editorial board of major journals and in every cardiovascular subspecialty. This review summarizes differences in cardiovascular risk factors and disparities in management and outcomes of ischemic heart disease, heart failure, aortic stenosis, and atrial fibrillation. It also provides an overview of female representation as participants and leaders of clinical trials, editorial boards, and academic institutions. Strategies to overcome these disparities are proposed with examples of successful programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.