Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38495565›Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

Machine and deep learning methods for predicting 3D genome organization.

Brydon P G Wall, My Nguyen, J Chuck Harrell, Mikhail G Dozmorov

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brydon P G WallCenter for Biological Data Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA.
My NguyenDepartment of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
J Chuck HarrellDepartment of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA.
Mikhail G DozmorovDepartment of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.

Funding

Circumventing acquired carboplatin resistance in triple-negative breast cancersR01CA246182 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI HARRELL, JOSHUA (CHUCK) · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
Characterization of metastasis models derived from breast cancer patients of African descentR21CA273779 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI HARRELL, JOSHUA (CHUCK) · 2022 to 2023
$395k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246182NCI NIH HHS R21 CA273779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-Dimensional (3D) chromatin interactions, such as enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs), loops, Topologically Associating Domains (TADs), and A/B compartments play critical roles in a wide range of cellular processes by regulating gene expression. Recent development of chromatin conformation capture technologies has enabled genome-wide profiling of various 3D structures, even with single cells. However, current catalogs of 3D structures remain incomplete and unreliable due to differences in technology, tools, and low data resolution. Machine learning methods have emerged as an alternative to obtain missing 3D interactions and/or improve resolution. Such methods frequently use genome annotation data (ChIP-seq, DNAse-seq, etc.), DNA sequencing information (k-mers, Transcription Factor Binding Site (TFBS) motifs), and other genomic properties to learn the associations between genomic features and chromatin interactions. In this review, we discuss computational tools for predicting three types of 3D interactions (EPIs, chromatin interactions, TAD boundaries) and analyze their pros and cons. We also point out obstacles of computational prediction of 3D interactions and suggest future research directions.

Indexed as

chromatindeep learningenhancer-promoter interactionsHi-Cloopsmachine learningsoftwareTADs

Identifiers

PMID38495565
PMCPMC10942493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.