Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38495517›Full record

ArticleCurrent dermatology reports2023

Patient and Clinician Satisfaction in Teledermatology: Key Factors for Successful Implementation.

Yiwen Li, Anna Pulminskas, Olivia Collins, Salma de la Feld, Howa Yeung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current dermatology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yiwen LiEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Anna PulminskasEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Olivia CollinsClinical Resource Hub, VA Veterans Integrated Service Network 7, Decatur, GA.
Salma de la FeldDepartment of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Howa YeungDepartment of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002381 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY M BLUMBERG, Anandi Nayan Sheth · 2017 to 2026
$14.1M
Neuro HPA Project 1U54AG062334 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ighovwerha Ofotokun · 2018 to 2026
$12.2M
Epidemiology, impact, and experience of acne in transgender personsK23AR075888 · NIAMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YEUNG, HOWA · 2020 to 2024
$789k
HSRD VA I01 HX003473NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002381NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR075888NIAMS NIH HHS L30 AR076081NIA NIH HHS U54 AG062334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of review: Teledermatology has emerged as a promising solution for remote dermatologic care, especially during COVID-19 pandemic. It improves access to care through information and communication technologies. This paper explores patient and clinician satisfaction in teledermatology. Recent findings: Patient satisfaction encompasses various aspects, including future willingness, the quality of care, technical quality, and access to care. Clinician satisfaction is influenced by quality of care, implementation, technical aspects, clinician-patient rapport, and financial considerations. It is important to evaluate patient and clinician satisfaction in different teledermatology models, including store-and-forward, live interactive, and hybrid interactive approaches. Summary: By evaluating satisfaction within different teledermatology models and addressing the factors that impact satisfaction, teledermatology can ensure high-quality care and promote positive outcomes. With proper implementation and ongoing evaluation, teledermatology has the potential to become a widely accepted and valuable component of dermatologic care, offering enhanced access to specialized services.

Indexed as

Clinician SatisfactionDirect-to-PatientLive interactivePatient SatisfactionStore-and-forwardTeledermatology

Identifiers

PMID38495517
PMCPMC10939000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.