Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38495438›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2024

Single-cell lineage tracing with endogenous markers.

Yan Xue, Zezhuo Su, Xinyi Lin, Mun Kay Ho, Ken H O Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biophysical reviews · 2024
    Article
  7. Biophysical Reviews: peering into 2024.Biophysical reviews · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yan XueSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Zezhuo SuSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xinyi LinSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Mun Kay HoSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ken H O YuSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resolving lineage relationships between cells in an organism provides key insights into the fate of individual cells and drives a fundamental understanding of the process of development and disease. A recent rapid increase in experimental and computational advances for detecting naturally occurring somatic nuclear and mitochondrial mutation at single-cell resolution has expanded lineage tracing from model organisms to humans. This review discusses the advantages and challenges of experimental and computational techniques for cell lineage tracing using somatic mutation as endogenous DNA barcodes to decipher the relationships between cells during development and tumour evolution. We outlook the advantages of spatial clonal evolution analysis and single-cell lineage tracing using endogenous genetic markers.

Indexed as

Mitochondrial mutationsSingle-cell lineage tracingSomatic nuclear mutationsSpatial clonal evolution

Identifiers

PMID38495438
PMCPMC10937880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.