ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2024
Timing percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiovascular events in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe timing of coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) needs to be well defined. In this study, based on the timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we evaluated the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in NSTEMI patients.
methodsIn this longitudinal study, we included 156 NSTEMI patients who underwent a PCI at three time points, including <12 hr. (n = 53), 12-24 hr. (n = 54), and ≥24 hr. (n = 49) and followed them for one, three, and six months to monitor major cardiovascular events. The data analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20.
resultFour patients (2.56%) were hospitalized during the one-month follow-up, and only one patient (0.06%) had NSTEMI. The incidence of complications, such as readmission, acute coronary syndrome (ACS; 4 patients [2.56%]), and unstable angina (UA; 3 patients [1.92%]) did not differ significantly among the three intervention times. The occurrence of NSTEMI, UA, and recurrent PCI was 2.56%, 3.20%, and 5.12% in four, five, and eight patients, respectively, and no significant differences were observed among the aforementioned times. In the follow-up after six months, the incidence of STEMI, stroke, TLR, and other all-course deaths was observed in one person (0.06%), which all occurred within 12-24 hours. The difference among the three intervention times was non-significant.
conclusionOur findings revealed an insignificant difference between the incidence of complications and the three-intervention time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38495410PMC10944351W4394755971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.