ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Integration of a respiratory function monitor into newborn positive pressure ventilation training; development of a standardised training intervention.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- It takes two: development of simulation training for two-handed neonatal mask ventilation integrating a respiratory function monitor; a non-randomised before-and-after simulation study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Low-dose, high-frequency simulation with respiratory function monitor feedback enhances face mask ventilation across neonatal resuscitation devices: A prospective study in neonatology fellows.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Confirmation of successful supraglottic airway device placement in neonates using a respiratory function monitor.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Addressing the Humans in the Delivery Room-Optimising Neonatal Monitoring and Decision-Making in Transition.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: One in twenty newborns require resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation (PPV) at birth. Newborn face mask ventilation is often poorly performed. To address this, the potential role of respiratory function monitors (RFM) in newborn resuscitation training has been highlighted. The objective of this study was to develop a standardised training intervention on newborn PPV using an RFM with a simple visual display to identify and correct suboptimal ventilations. Methods: We adapted the framework from a simulation development guideline to create a hands-on intervention on newborn PPV using an RFM with simple visual feedback (Monivent NeoTraining). We enrolled a group of healthcare professionals to a manikin-based pilot study as part of this process, conducting a series of teaching sessions to refine the intervention. Suggested changes were gathered from participants and instructors. Our main objective was to develop a standardised, reproducible training intervention. Results: A standardised training intervention on newborn PPV was systematically developed. Twenty-six healthcare professionals working in tertiary neonatal care participated in a pilot study, consisting of eight training sessions. Each iteration of the intervention was informed by the previous session. Instructions for the delivery of teaching were standardised and a training algorithm was developed. Conclusion: RFM's have been shown to be effective tools in research settings, addressing poor technique and face mask leak. They are not routinely used in newborn resuscitation training. To address this, we developed a standardised training intervention on newborn PPV using an RFM with simple visual feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.