ArticleHeliyon2024
Unlocking stroke prediction: Harnessing projection-based statistical feature extraction with ML algorithms.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive Performance of Artificial Intelligence Models for Stroke Risk Stratification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingPooled it
- Improving stroke risk prediction by integrating XGBoost, optimized principal component analysis, and explainable artificial intelligence.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Extracellular Trap-Related Genes as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Endometriosis.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-communicable diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes, are responsible for approximately 71% of all deaths worldwide. Stroke, a cerebrovascular disorder, is one of the leading contributors to this burden among the top three causes of death. Early recognition of symptoms can encourage a balanced lifestyle and provide essential information for stroke prediction. To identify a stroke patient and risk factors, machine learning (ML) is a key tool for physicians. Due to different data measurement scales and their probability distributional assumptions, ML-based algorithms struggle to detect risk factors. Furthermore, when dealing with risk factors with high-dimensional features, learning algorithms struggle with complexity. In this study, rigorous statistical tests are used to identify risk factors, and PCA-FA (Integration of Principal Components and Factors) and FPCA (Factor Based PCA) approaches are proposed for projecting suitable feature representations for improving learning algorithm performances. The study dataset consists of different clinical, lifestyle, and genetic attributes, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of potential risk factors associated with stroke, which contains 5110 patient records. Using significant test (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.