ArticleHeliyon2024
Distributionally robust optimization scheduling of port energy system considering hydrogen production and ammonia synthesis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to effectively address the uncertainty risks of port energy system caused by intermittence and fluctuation of renewable energy, this paper proposes a scheduling method for port energy system based on distributionally robust optimization (DRO) considering ammonia synthesis after hydrogen production by water electrolysis (P2H2A), and uses real data from Tianjin Port for example analysis. The calculation results show that 1 h selected for the scheduling interval of P2H2A is reasonable, it can ensure that the ammonia synthesis reaction transitions smoothly to the new steady state, and the temperature and pressure of the ammonia converter meet safety constraints. The two-stage scheduling of port energy system based on DRO can be divided into pre-scheduling in the day-ahead stage and rescheduling in the intraday stage, which can improve the capacity of anti-risk for stochastic optimization and overcome the conservatism of robust optimization, and consider economy and robustness. Moreover, the rescheduling decision can be transformed to a prediction error function, the result of two-stage scheduling based on DRO is the pre-scheduling result, which is between the cost of stochastic optimization and robust optimization. As the Wasserstein distance-based sphere radius increases, the pre-scheduling cost of DRO gradually deviates from risk neutral stochastic optimization and leans towards risk averse robust optimization. When the Wasserstein distance-based sphere radius remains constant, the variance gradually decreases as the number of scenarios increases, which can promote the Wasserstein distance-based fuzzy set to converge to the true distribution. When the number of scenarios is greater than 15, the pre-scheduling cost will no longer fluctuate significantly, and the calculation time is in the range of 1200 s-6600 s. It can meet the demands of day-ahead scheduling calculation time. Therefore, the scheduling model has outstanding advantages in the computing time to improve the flexibility and economy of Tianjin Port's energy system scheduling, considering ammonia synthesis after hydrogen production using renewable energy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.