ReviewSeminars in plastic surgery2024
H Vessel Formation as a Marker for Enhanced Bone Healing in Irradiated Distraction Osteogenesis.
Review in Seminars in plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroimmune Regulation in Posttraumatic Bone Repair: From Inflammatory Transition to Neurovascular Coupling and Functional Recovery.Journal of cellular physiology · 2026Review
- Sonic hedgehog reduces alveolar bone resorption by triggering the coupling of type H vessel formation and osteogenesis in a periodontitis model.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- CGRP-Loaded ROS-Responsive Hydrogel Restores Neuro-Angiogenic Signaling to Promote Bone Regeneration in Diabetes-Associated Periodontitis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Radial Periosteal Distraction as a Novel Intervention for Raynaud Syndrome with Gangrene: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the setting of bone defects, the injured vasculature and loss of hemodynamic inflow leads to hematoma formation and low oxygen tension which stimulates vascular expansion through the HIf-1α pathway. Most importantly, this pathway upregulates sprouting of type H vessels (CD31hiEmcnhi vessels). H vessels engage in direct interaction with perivascular osteoprogenitor cells (OPCs), osteoblasts, and preosteoclasts of bone formation and remodeling. This angiogenic-osteogenic coupling leads to synchronous propagation of vascular and bony tissue for regenerative healing. A growing body of literature demonstrates that H vessels constitute a large portion of bone's innate capacity for osteogenic healing. We believe that CD31hiEmcnhi vessels play a role in bone healing during distraction osteogenesis (DO). DO is a procedure that utilizes traction forces to facilitate induction of endogenous bone formation and regeneration of surrounding soft tissues such as skin, muscle, tendon, and neurovascular structures. While the H vessel response to mechanical injury is adequate to facilitate healing in normal healthy tissue, it remains inadequate to overcome the devastation of radiation. We posit that the destruction of CD31hiEmcnhi vessels plays a role in precluding DO's effectiveness in irradiated bone defect healing. We aim, therefore, to recapitulate the normal pathway of bony healing by utilizing the regenerative capacity of H vessels. We hypothesize that using localized application of deferoxamine (DFO) will enhance the H vessel-mediated vasculogenic response to radiation damage and ultimately enable osteogenic healing during DO. This discovery could potentially be exploited by developing translational therapeutics to hopefully accelerate bone formation and shorten the DO consolidation period, thereby potentially expanding DO's utilization in irradiated bone healing. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups: DO, radiation with DO (xDO), and radiation with DO and DFO implantation (xDODFO). Experimental groups received 35 Gy of radiation. All groups underwent DO. The treatment group received injections into the osteotomy site, every other day, beginning on postoperative day (POD) 4 of DFO. Animals were sacrificed on POD 40. For immunohistochemical analysis, mandibles were dissected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 hours, decalcified in Cal-Ex II for 2 days, dehydrated through graded ethanol of increasing concentration, and then embedded in paraffin. Samples were cut into 7-μm thick longitudinally oriented sections including the metaphysis and diaphysis. CD31 and Emcn double immunofluorescent staining were performed to evaluate the extent of CD31hiEmcnhi vessel formation. Bone sections were then stained with conjugated antibodies overnight at 4°C. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst. Slides were also double stained with Osterix and CD31 to study the quantity of H vessel-mediated recruitment of OPCs to accelerate bone healing. Images were acquired with a Nikon Ti2 widefield microscope and analyzed in NIS- Elements Advanced Research 5.41.02 software. The abundance of type H vessels is represented by the area fraction of CD31 + Emcn+ vessel area inside the regenerate sample. OPC concomitant proliferation into the distraction gap is represented by the area fraction of Osterix+ cell area inside of the regenerate sample. There were 6× more type H vessels in DO groups than in xDO groups. Localized DFO significantly increased the abundance of type H vessels of irradiated DO animals compared to xDO by 15× (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.