Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38495048›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2024

Surgical treatment of patients with chronic rupture of the pectoralis major muscle tendon. Prospective comparative study with 2 years of follow-up.

Alberto de Castro Pochini, Benno Ejnisman, Carlos V Andreoli, Andre F Yamada, Ivan R B Godoy, Moises Cohen, Maria T Seixas, Paulo S Belangero, Debora C Hipolide

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alberto de Castro PochiniOrthopaedic Department, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Benno EjnismanOrthopaedic Department, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos V AndreoliOrthopaedic Department, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Andre F YamadaOrthopaedic Department, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ivan R B GodoyOrthopaedic Department, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Moises CohenOrthopaedic Department, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Maria T SeixasPathology Department, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo S BelangeroOrthopaedic Department, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Debora C HipolidePsychobiology Department, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare outcomes between autologous fascia lata and autologous hamstring grafts for chronic pectoralis major muscle (PMM) rupture repair, and perform histological, and imaging analyses. Forty male patients with chronic PMM ruptures (time since injury ranging from >3 months to 5 years) and a mean age of 37.3 years (SD = 9.7 years) were evaluated. One group (20 patients) received an autologous semitendinosus graft, and another group (20 patients) received an autologous fascia lata graft for PMM reconstruction. These patients with fascia lata grafts by Bak

Indexed as

comparative studymuscle strengthpectoralis musclesrupture

Identifiers

PMID38495048
PMCPMC10943627
OpenAlexW4392888867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.